Week 10: Review on Presentation Group 5 CONFLICT

Review on presentation of group 5: CONFLICT

Group Name: DCLD

Group Topic: Conflict
Grade:  CR

Clarity of the oral presentation

Most of the group has a very clear oral presentation. They explained very well in terms of the meaning, types and resolution of conflict. However most of the member seem to be reading out the text from the slide and the note and did not explain much from the text on the screen. Things that could be improved in this presentation is to structure out the list of the presentation. This will allows audience to understand what will be pointed into presentation.

Clarity of the written presentation

The text in the slide was in a good size and color theme allows audience to read out the text easily. However at some point of the presentation they going back and forward a slide this somehow confuse the audience and show that the presentation is not well structured. Diagram was a good element used in this presentation. However it was a bit small and I did not really understand what is in the diagram. Supporting speech help audience to identify what the diagram is about but it would be better to have it in a larger scale and so audience know which part you are up to.

Distinctiveness and specificity of the examples

The group point out the example about conflict relating to the project. I like the idea of the technical conflict between BIM and IFC. This is very a good example but it would be even more better to go further and explain a bit more about this example. The group did not mention any personal conflict which I think it is also an important component which has a high effect to the group position and project outcome.

Reference

Some of the images were references properly. Even thought the image was taken by them self or is a screen shot of their work. Some image capture/title/ description will help audience to understand better of how images can be related to to the content they are presenting.

The conceptual context

The group explained the position of their project which is an important point of the presentation. The example of the conflict were pointed out earlier but somehow did not really link back to the project and the process itself.

The still image

The diagram and chart were not clear and was not able to read. It would be better to enlarge the image with a high resolution. This way audience then can read through the chart and the diagram you have provided. And some of the images were not mention in the presentation. However I do like the image that they were taken them self to show to concept of conflict. This is a good way to stay on the theme of conflict.

The presentation shows that they have done a level of research but still lack of structuring the presentation. The strong point of this presentation is that they have covered all the point that needed to be there but did not go through in deep detail. With more explanation to the group project and how conflict have an effect onto them will fulfill this presentation even better.