Wednesday, May 1, 2013

Week 8: Review on presentation group 3 and 4 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Review on presentation group 3 and 4 : Intellectual Property


Group Name: Interactive Architecture
Group Topic: Intellectual Property
Grade:  CR

Clarity of the oral presentation
In my opinion, the oral presentation was concise and clear in terms of concept idea of the topic. However some of the member spoke was not loud enough which make it hard to catch what they were saying. But it the slide they provided with a point form of the topic it give me a bit of understanding of what they are presenting. The group had plan well who is responsible to which topic and organize the order of the content quite well.

Clarity of the written presentation
They have covered all the information about intellectual property. This is very detailed and written clearly to the slide. With the use of short sentences and point form, it is easy to read and focus.

Distinctiveness and specificity of the examples
This group has taken the example in which well known and most people must have heard about it that is very effective. The case of Apple and Samsung demonstrated the concepts of intellectual property very well. The group has chosen a very clear example for their presentation. I like the example of the cup holder but I think it was not clear of which part of the intellectual property it applied.

Reference
The reference at the last page of presentation was good and properly reference. However to support the idea, I think it would be advantage to reference the source of information about Apple and Samsung lawsuit came from such as newspaper and etc. This is to support more understanding of the audience to the topic.

The conceptual context
The term did not demonstrate the connection between the topic to their project at all. They did not present any element from the project which can be relate to intellectual property. However they have a deep understanding to the content of the topic in term of theory.

The still image
The image used in the presentation was very powerful in order to communicate the concept. They picked quite a good example and images for their presentation. Images used were clear in size and effective to the content. Personally I think this group has most images that make things understand easily.

Group Name: Geri Ambience
Group Topic: Intellectual Property
Grade:  DN

Clarity of the oral presentation
The group’s oral presentation communicate a clear and concise theoretical of the group topic concept. Corresponding with the slide they have produced it create a clear point of what are the content that needed to be focus. All the group member has clear and loud noise which is advantage to the audience to understand.

Clarity of the written presentation
Simple and short sentences in point from allow audience to grab the most important content and so easier to understand with the explanation from each group members. This is very clear and concise.

Distinctiveness and specificity of the examples
Most of the example is linked to their own project. This group is using Kinect SDK that holds some condition with the intellectual property. The example that they created with the software copyright demonstrated how important this topic is. They also mention the sauce code that they used, all the credit and reference needed to refer to the resource to keep the intellectual property right. This is very effective and shows their good understanding to the concept.

Reference
Good reference at the end of the slide. They have referenced all the resource of their content in this presentation. They also mention this is also part of intellectual property. I think this is also a good example that everyone always experience.

The conceptual context
As the fact that they relate the content to their project, I think they have a good conceptual context towards this task and each member can identify those examples to the content.

The still image
There was not much image in this presentation, which I would recommend to have more image as it keep audience engage to the presentation and can communicate the content better than text.

This group is working on the Kinect and Arduino like our group. I think this is a good advantage to us to be aware of all these conditions apply. This is to aware ourselves not to copy or taken someone’s else work with out any acknowledgement and reference.




No comments:

Post a Comment